The Kollel adds:
3) I found, bs'd, that the Sefer Dvar Shaul on Maseches Sotah 10:3 (by Rav Shaul Kosovsky-Shachor) asks this question.
a)
First, he points out that it is only if the husband denies that he had
relations with his wife while on the journey that one Ed is not
believed, but if one Ed testified that they had been together and the
husband made no comment, this would be sufficient to prevent the
drinking.
b)
The Dvar Shaul explains that if the husband denies it, then separating
the husband from the wife is considered a "Davar sheb'Ervah" and there
is a major rule (see Gitin 2b), "Ein Davar sheb'Ervah Pachos mi'Shtayim"
-- one cannot effect anything in matters of marriage and divorce with
less than two witnesses. If we prevent the drinking on the basis of one
witness, this means that the husband and wife must part, so this is
equivalent to giving a Get with only one witness, which is impossible.
c)
The Dvar Shaul writes that it is only when the Ed testifies on Tum'ah
that the Torah believes him, but if he testifies on relations between
husband and wife (which is not Tum'ah but it is a Torah prohibition
since the wife is suspected of Znus), this is considered as testimony on
a side factor that prevents her from drinking, and the Torah does not
believe one witness for this.
d) In short, the Dvar Shaul answers that the Torah believes one witness only about Tum'ah, but not on a side issue.
Kol Tuv,
Dovid Bloom
Comments
Post a Comment